Skip to content

Ubitrix International

Financial Conflict of Interest Policy for Research

Introduction

As a recipient of funds from public and private sources to support research activities, Ubitrix International is required to maintain policies and processes consistent with federal regulations and policies of individual research sponsorsconcerning financial conflicts of interest in research. These requirements exist to maintain the trust of the public, our research volunteers, our research partners, and other stakeholders.

Ubitrix International recognizes and values the importance of researcher relationships with external entities. While such relationships provide benefit and support to our research activities, in some instances such activities give rise to financial conflicts of interest. Conflicts of interest have the potential to influence key elements of a research program, such as studydesign, data collection and analysis, as well as choice of vendors for research supplies. These conflicts are not inherentlybad, nor are they always evidence of bias. However, our role as stewards of research funding requires that we identify and manage such conflicts so as not to put our research, or public confidence in our research, at risk.

Ubitrix International’s policy on financial conflict of interest (hereinafter, the FCOI Policy) conforms to the 2011 revised FCOI regulation from the NIH, Promoting Objectivity in Research (42 CFR Part 50 Subpart F), as well as the NationalScience Foundation Grant Policy Manual (Section 510).

The FCOI Policy applies to each Investigator who is planning to participate in or is participating in research, whether or not such research is federally funded.

Covered Institution

Ubitrix International., “Company” or “Institution” is covered under this policy as required by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and applicable US regulations. It is the responsibility of the Company to Promote Objectivity in all Research performed by or for the company including all research for which Public Health Service, which includes the National Institutes of Health, funding is sought or obtained. Significant Financial Interests (SFI)s include financial interests that are related to an Investigator’s institutional responsibilities. The Company is responsible for determining whether SFI relates to NIH-funded research and if it is a Financial Conflict of Interest (FCOI).

This policy provides the standards that give a reasonable expectation that the design, conduct, and reporting of NIH-funded research will be free from bias resulting from Investigator financial conflicts of interest. The Company shall maintain an up-to-date, written, enforced policy that complies with the FCOI regulation and make it available via a publicly accessible Web site. The Company and all of its employees shall comply with this policy and applicable regulations in all research.

HHS/NIH Authority

The HHS may at any time inquire into the institutional procedures and actions regarding conflicting financial interests in NIH-funded research. The NIH and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) have authority that applies before, during, or after an award with regard to any investigator disclosure of financial interests, regardless of whether or not the disclosure resulted in the institution’s determination of an FCOI.

Applicable Regulations

http://grants.nih.gov/grants/compliance/42_CFR_50_Subpart_F.htm

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-08-25/pdf/2011-21633.pdf

Definitions

Company shall mean Ubitrix International.

Institution shall mean Ubitrix International.

Institutional responsibilities means an Investigator’s professional responsibilities on behalf of the Institution, and as defined by the Institution in its policy on financial conflicts of interest, which may include for example: activities such as research, research consultation, teaching, professional practice, institutional committee memberships, and service on panels such as Institutional Review Boards or Data and Safety Monitoring Boards.

Investigator means the project director or principal Investigator and any other person, regardless of title or position, who is responsible for the design, conduct, or reporting of research funded by the NIH, or proposed for such funding, which may include, for example, collaborators or consultants.

Responsible Individual shall mean that person designated herein.

Senior/key personnel means the PD/PI and any other person identified as senior/key personnel by the Institution in the grant application, progress report, or any other report submitted to the PHS by the Institution under the regulation. (Note: Different definition than the NIH Grants Policy Statement.)

Significant Financial Interest (SFI) shall be interpreted as

  1. A financial interest consisting of one or more of the following interests of the Investigator (and those of the Investigator’s spouse and dependent children) that reasonably appears to be related to the Investigator’s institutional responsibilities:
    1. With regard to any publicly traded entity, a significant financial interest exists if the value of any remuneration received from the entity in the twelve months preceding the disclosure and the value of any equity interest in the entity as of the date of disclosure, when aggregated, exceeds $5,000. For purposes of this definition, remuneration includes salary and any payment for services not otherwise identified as salary (e.g., consulting fees, honoraria, paid authorship); equity interest includes any stock, stock option, or other ownership interest, as determined through reference to public prices or other reasonable measures of fair market value;
    2. With regard to any non-publicly traded entity, a significant financial interest exists if the value of any remuneration received from the entity in the twelve months preceding the disclosure, when aggregated, exceeds $5,000, or when the Investigator (or the Investigator’s spouse or dependent children) holds any equity interest (e.g., stock, stock option, or other ownership interest); or
    3. Intellectual property rights and interests (e.g., patents, copyrights), upon receipt of income related to such rights and interests.
  2. Investigators also must disclose the occurrence of any reimbursed or sponsored travel (i.e., that which is paid on behalf of the Investigator and not reimbursed to the Investigator so that the exact monetary value may not be readily available), related to their institutional responsibilities; provided, however, that this disclosure requirement does not apply to travel that is reimbursed or sponsored by a federal, state, or local government agency, an Institution of higher education as defined at 20 U.S.C. 1001(a), an academic teaching hospital, a medical center, or a research institute that is affiliated with an Institution of higher education. The Institution’s FCOI policy will specify the details of this disclosure, which will include, at a minimum, the purpose of the trip, the identity of the sponsor/organizer, the destination, and the duration. In accordance with the Institution’s FCOI policy, the institutional official(s) will determine if further information is needed, including a determination or disclosure of monetary value, in order to determine whether the travel constitutes an FCOI with the PHS-funded research.

The following shall be excluded from Significant Financial Interest

  1. Salary, royalties, or other remuneration paid by the Institution to the Investigator if the Investigator is currently employed or otherwise appointed by the Institution, including intellectual property rights assigned to the Institution and agreements to share in royalties related to such rights;
  2. Any ownership interest in the Institution held by the Investigator, if the Institution is a commercial or for-profit organization;
  3. Income from investment vehicles, such as mutual funds and retirement accounts, as long as the Investigator does not directly control the investment decisions made in these vehicles;
  4. Income from seminars, lectures, or teaching engagements sponsored by a federal, state, or local government agency, an Institution of higher education as defined at 20 U.S.C. 1001(a), an academic teaching hospital, a medical center, or a research institute that is affiliated with an Institution of higher education; or
  5. Income from service on advisory committees or review panels for a federal, state, or local government agency, an Institution of higher education as defined at 20 U.S.C. 1001(a), an academic teaching hospital, a medical center, or a research institute that is affiliated with an Institution of higher education.

Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program means the extramural research program for small businesses that is established by the Awarding Components of the Public Health Service and certain other Federal agencies under Public Law 97-219, the Small Business Innovation Development Act, as amended. For purposes of this subpart, the term SBIR Program also includes the Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Program, which was established by Public Law 102-564.

Publication of FCOI Policy and Conflicts

This Policy shall be made available on the Company’s publicly assessable web site. It shall be updated as required when changes are made or as specified in the regulation. Additionally, prior to the expenditure of any NIH/HHS funds, the Responsible Individual shall make information concerning FCOIs held by senior/key personnel via the Company’s Web site and update such information as specified in the regulation.

Training

FCOI training required. Each Investigator must complete training prior to engaging in research related to any NIH-funded grant and at least every four years, and immediately under the designated circumstances:

FCOI training is required of each Investigator:

  1. Prior to engaging in research related to any NIH funded project
  2. At least every four years, and
  3. Immediately when any of the following circumstances apply:
    1. Institution revises its policy in a manner that affects the investigator;
    2. When an investigator is new to the institution; or
    3. When the institution finds an Investigator is not in compliance with the Institution’s policy or management plan.
  4. The training must inform each Investigator of the:
    1. Regulation;
    2. Institution’s policy on FCOI; and
    3. Investigator’s responsibilities regarding disclosure of SFIs

Duties of the Investigators

Investigator Disclosure of SFI

The investigator shall disclose any SFI:

Duties of the Responsible Individual

Management Plan

Any FCOI or non-compliance with this Policy shall be reported to the Responsible Individual. The Responsible Individual shall determine if there was a non-compliance in coordination with the CEO. The Responsible Individual shall within 120 days of the Institution’s determination of non-compliance, complete a retrospective review of the investigator’s activities and the NIH-funded research project to determine if there was bias in the design, conduct, or reporting of such research. The Responsible Individual shall document the retrospective review.

If bias is found, a Mitigation Report shall be prepared by the Responsible Individual.

The retrospective review and Mitigation Report shall include:

Application Certification

The company shall Certify in each application for funding that the Institution:

  1. Has in effect an up-to-date written, and enforced administrative process to identify and manage FCOIs related to all PHS research projects.
  2. Shall promote and enforce Investigator compliance with the regulation pertaining to disclosure of SFIs.
  3. Shall manage FCOIs and provide initial and ongoing FCOI reports to PHS/NIH.
  4. Agrees to make information available upon request relating to any Investigator disclosure of financial interest and the Institution’s review of, and response to, such disclosure, whether or not the disclosure resulted in the Institution’s determination of an FCOI.
  5. Fully comply with the requirements of the regulation.

Designated Institutional Official(s); i.e.: Responsible Individual

The company shall:

  1. Designate an Institutional Official(s), the Responsible Individual, to solicit & review disclosure statements from each Investigator planning to participate in, or is participating in, PHS/NIH-funded research. This Responsible Individual for the Company is the Director of Quality and Regulatory Affairs. The Responsible Individual will be made aware of any possible financial conflicts of interest by the CEO and/or Controller at the Company, who will both be trained on the policy.
  2. Provide guidelines to identify conflicting interests related to proposed or PHS/NIH-funded research. This policy provides those guidelines.
  3. Designated Institutional Official(s) develop management plans that specify the actions that have been, and shall be, taken to manage FCOI. This Policy provides that Management Plan. The person who shall update this Management Plan is the Responsible Individual.

Maintenance of Records

The Company shall maintain records of all Investigator disclosures of financial interests and the Institution’s review of, and response to, such disclosures (whether or not a disclosure resulted in the Institution’s determination of FCOI) and all actions under the Institution’s policy or retrospective review, if applicable

  1. for at least three years from the date of submission of the final expenditures report or, where applicable,
  2. from other dates specified in 45 C.F.R. 74.53(b) and 92.42 (b) for different situations.

Reporting

The Responsible Individual and Controller shall assure that any FCOI is reported on the Web Site prior to the expenditure of any funds under the award and within 60 days for any interest that the Institution identifies as conflicting subsequent to the Institution’s initial report under the award.

At least annually (at the same time as when the Institution is required to submit the annual progress report, multi-year progress report, if applicable, or at time of extension) the Institution shall provide the status of the FCOI and any changes to the management plan, if applicable, until the completion of the project.

The Company shall, within 120 days of the Company’s determination of non-compliance, complete a retrospective review of the investigator’s activities and the NIH-funded research project to determine if there was bias in the design, conduct, or reporting of such research. Institution is required to document the retrospective review.

The Responsible Individual shall work with the Controller to submit the following reports to the NIH:

All FCOI reports are submitted to NIH through the eRA Commons FCOI Module. It shall contain:

Public Accessibility of FCOIs on the website

Retrospective Review

If results of the retrospective review warrant, update previously submitted FCOI report

Electronic Research Administration (eRA) Commons FCOI Module

The reporting tool for submitting FCOI reports for grants and cooperative agreements is the eRA Commons FCOI Module. This reporting tool allows the Company to:

To prepare, Institutional Signing Officials must assign FCOI roles to users in eRA Commons.

HHS Authority

The HHS may at any time inquire into the Institutional procedures and actions regarding conflicting financial interests in NIH-funded research. The HHS authority applies before, during, or after an award with regard to any Investigator disclosure of financial interests, regardless of whether or not the disclosure resulted in the Institution’s determination of an FCOI.

Enforcement

The CEO, with the advice and consult of the Responsible Individual, shall have the authority to enforce this Policy. Sanctions, administrative actions, and other actions up to and including termination may be taken to enforce this policy and ensure Investigator compliance.

The CEO may require that one or more of the following actions be taken in order to manage, reduce, or eliminate a potential Conflict of Interest:

  1. Disclosure of Significant Financial Interests, including to the public, human subjects, researchers and other participants and publishers;
  2. Monitoring of PHS-funded Research by independent researchers and/or reviewers, disinterested individuals or committees;
  3. Disqualification from participation in all or a portion of the PHS-funded Research;
  4. Requiring that Significant Financial Interests be divested, restructured, or placed in blind trust;
  5. Modification or severance of relationships that create a potential Conflict of Interest;
  6. Changing terms of agreement relating to the PHS-funded Research;
  7. Requiring that Investigator participation in the recruitment or consent of subjects in human subjects PHS-funded Research be prohibited or restricted;
  8. Requiring additional disclosures or actions with respect to matters before the Research Management Team; or
  9. Requiring non-participation in any business transactions between the Company and parties to agreements involving sponsored PHS-funded Research.

Remedies

If the failure of an Investigator to comply with an Institution’s financial conflicts of interest policy or a financial conflict of interest management plan appears to have biased the design, conduct, or reporting of the PHS-funded research, the Institution shall promptly notify the PHS Awarding Component of the corrective action taken or to be taken. The PHS Awarding Component will consider the situation and, as necessary, take appropriate action, or refer the matter to the Institution for further action, which may include directions to the Institution on how to maintain appropriate objectivity in the PHS-funded research project. PHS may, for example, require Institutions employing such an Investigator to enforce any applicable corrective actions prior to a PHS award or when the transfer of a PHS grant(s) involves such an Investigator.

The PHS Awarding Component and/or HHS may inquire at any time before, during, or after award into any Investigator disclosure of financial interests and the Institution’s review (including any retrospective review) of, and response to, such disclosure, regardless of whether the disclosure resulted in the Institution’s determination of a financial conflict of interest. An Institution is required to submit, or permit on site review of, all records pertinent to compliance with this subpart. To the extent permitted by law, HHS will maintain the confidentiality of all records of financial interests. On the basis of its review of records or other information that may be available, the PHS Awarding Component may decide that a particular financial conflict of interest will bias the objectivity of the PHS-funded research to such an extent that further corrective action is needed or that the Institution has not managed the financial conflict of interest in accordance with this subpart. The PHS Awarding Component may determine that imposition of specific award conditions under 45 CFR 75.207, or suspension of funding or other enforcement action under 45 CFR 75.371, is necessary until the matter is resolved.

In any case in which the HHS determines that a PHS-funded project of clinical research whose purpose is to evaluate the safety or effectiveness of a drug, medical device, or treatment has been designed, conducted, or reported by an Investigator with a financial conflict of interest that was not managed or reported by the Institution as required by this subpart, the Institution shall require the Investigator involved to disclose the financial conflict of interest in each public presentation of the results of the research and to request an addendum to previously published presentations.

Revision of Policies

This policy shall be reviewed upon changes to the Federal Regulation and revised as appropriate.